The Associated Press had an article describing a Connecticut supermarket chain's experiment with automatic checkout lanes.  The chain, Big Y, has decided to phase them out.  Read it here.

"Kings are the slaves of history." - Leo Tolstoy

The "Great Man" view of history fell out of fashion after WWII.  It holds that history is created by a series of heroes, geniuses, and villains, and that learning history is simply learning a series of biographies.

Herbert Spencer, famous for coining the term "survival of the fittest," formulated the counterargument: that heroes are the products of their own time periods, or zeitgeist.  Leo Tolstoy supported this view of history throughout War and Peace, pointing out that great leaders, or kings, are slaves to the forces of their times.

The Zeitgeist view of history is probably the more accurate one, and it has influenced the teaching of history for the past several decades; knowledge of basic history during this time period among high school graduates has plummeted.

A quick look at non-fiction bestseller lists is revealing:  it is stuffed with the biographies of influential heroes (and scoundrels) throughout history.  It is the same with TV programs that deal with history: the Great Man view of history is alive and well in the private sector.

The debate should be moot to high school history teachers.  What matters is what is more easily learned.  Physicists don't mind that students learn the structure of the atom from a wildly inaccurate diagram.  Teaching is not about telling the truth - at first.  

Like many things in education, there is no real debate here.  The history curriculum could easily start with the Great Man view, and then move into the more subtle Zeitgeist view as the students get older and more sophisticated.

But starting with the Zeitgeist view will bore them to death.

I asked myself a simple question a few years ago:  Did remarkable people have remarkable mentors?  It has led me down an incredibly rich rabbit hole of forgotten giants and goose-bump inducing hidden histories.  One of my favorite "discoveries" is Martin Luther King’s mentor, the ignored colossus of the civil rights movement, Bayard Rustin.
 
A quick scan of Bayard Rustin’s accomplishments on his Wikipedia page beggar’s the reader’s belief.  He played a huge part in almost every freedom movement of the 20th century.  A summary:

• He convinced FDR to desegregate the defense industry in 1941 (an audacious and pragmatic move that had a huge influence on later achievements)
• He was jailed as a conscientious objector during WWII
• He protested Japanese internment camps
• Organized the Montgomery Bus Boycotts with Martin Luther King. (He had organized a similar one 10 years earlier before helping Rosa Park’s famous protest.)
• Founding member of CORE (the Congress on Racial Equality) and the SCLC (the Southern Christian Leadership Conference), with Martin Luther King.
• Organized the Freedom Rides in the early 1950s.
• Organized the March on Washington in 1963. (King’s “I have a dream” speech.)
• Headed the AFL-CIO’s movement to desegregate unions.
• Organized the US’s response to Apartheid.

 
Additionally, he was an eloquent writer, most famously authoring the anonymous pamphlet, “Speak Truth to Power.” Why anonymous?  Because he was gay. 
 
The FBI would track him; being affiliated with him would tarnish reputations. And yet, he had such a formidable intellect and incredible organizing skills that many leaders kept him on despite the risk.
 
Short biography
 
He grew up in a Quaker household, and started non-violent protests while still in school.  He was supporting himself as a nightclub singer during the Harlem Renaissance (incidentally, he had a remarkable music career as well, and sang with many of the blues and jazz greats of the time) when he became involved with the Communist Party of the United States in the 1930s.
 
Rustin became disillusioned with the party in the early 1940s. Hitler invaded the Soviet Union in 1941, and Stalin sent word to the Communist Party of the United States to shift its focus from civil rights (it had been encouraging the development of a separate nation in the southeastern United States!) to encouraging the US government to enter WWII against Germany.  Rustin left the party almost immediately.
 
Rustin’s Mentor: Nehru
 
In the late 1940s, right after the assassination of Mohandas Gandhi, Rustin went to India and met the leaders of the resistance.  He took notes, and brought his ideas back.  When he went to Alabama in the 1950s, he saw the charismatic potential of Martin Luther King, Jr.  Martin Luther King saw a great mentor in Bayard Rustin, and forged a strong friendship despite protests from his fellow ministers; the ministers wanted Rustin gone because of his homosexuality.  King ignored them, of course, and the rest is history.  King learned nonviolence from Rustin and Rustin helped King with logistics.
 
Even today, in the loonier corners of the internet, where white supremacists seek to discredit Martin Luther King, the first person they bring up is Bayard Rustin.  It is a testament to King's courage and intelligence that he was able to ignore the "realists" in his movement and benefit from Bayard Rustin's mentoring.
 
Rustin vs. Modern “Woke” Movement
 
Rustin hid himself during his lifetime, but the question remains, why is he still unrecognized?  Many of his beliefs, which he claims come from his Quaker upbringing and not his identity as a gay man or as a black man, are a challenge to modern progressives.
 
In the 1960’s, he criticized many white liberals, describing a “white liberal syndrome,” saying, “Negroes have been used by white Americans for many reasons, but it is only recently that they have been asked to satisfy the masochistic craving of white liberals for flagellation and rejection.”
 
Even more damning of modern activists were the points he was making during a fiery debate with Malcolm X.  He condemns Malcolm X’s movement as making loud, charismatic, but ultimately empty, gestures.
 
“I am merely pointing out that if you do not have an adequate program, you open yourself to being utilized…”
 
He points out the nerdy sounding idea of having “a program” multiple times in the debate, while Malcolm X makes strong sloganized rebuttals.
 
But this bias towards practical, strategic action is what made him so powerful and so essential to all of the achievements of the civil rights movement.  We need to heed his message today, and move beyond the sloganized, charismatic, social-media friendly gestures, and develop a program.
 
Bayard Rustin, true #rebeltoruler.

Scholars studying K-12 education often examine public systems around the world (like the Finnish school system) to figure out ways to improve the American system and then completely ignore the massive, multi-billion dollar domestic private education sector.  This sector includes not only private schools, but also private tutoring and education-themed books and services.

The first lesson that should be drawn from an examination of the market:  Fundamentals are important.

There has been a great shift in the content of the courses in public schools away from fundamentals, which are disparaged as "rote learning."  Grammar is barely taught; it shocks many people when they realize that few high school students can define "adverb."  

Here is how the private sector has responded:

1. Kumon: Kumon started off teaching math in the Japanese style.  Essentially, it is weapons-grade rote learning.  Students get worksheets with repetitive math skills and have to get every question on the worksheet correct to move on to the next level worksheet.  Sounds horrible?  Well, the company makes almost a billion dollars a year.
   
2. Eats, Shoots & Leaves:  This book was a remarkable number one bestselling publishing phenomenon, and its subject was grammar and punctuation.  Imagine getting in a time machine and telling Catholic school attending baby boomers that a book on grammar and punctuation is a future bestseller.
3. Trivia night: Part of the curriculum shift was motivated by the idea, "History shouldn't be about memorizing pointless facts. Kids hate that."  Bars all over the country have populated their slow nights with people trying to show off how many pointless facts they have memorized.

The shift away from fundamentals was motivated, of course, by good intentions.  The problem is the either/or mentality of many changes in education.  Pure fundamentals: bad.  No fundamentals: bad.  

Can't we meet somewhere in the middle?

Omar Bradley, known as the "G.I.'s General," was the last American general to earn five stars.  He was the senior American commander during the invasion of Europe that began with the D-Day landings in Normandy.  He recaptured Paris, and his army linked up with the Soviet allies on the Elbe river.

Education was founded on the archaic-sounding idea of "spreading civilization." To that end, it had three goals: learning, morality, and citizenship.  There has been much wailing and gnashing of teeth about our present test-focused system, and many of the complaints happen to be correct.  The system generally ignores the two old-fashioned goals of morality and citizenship.  (They are now often referred to with the hilariously obtuse label, the "non-cognitive" effects.)

The founders of the excellent, pioneering KIPP charter schools noticed that many of their students were not graduating from college despite having the academic chops to do so.  A whole New York Times story later, they realized that the students lacked important "non-cognitive" traits and adopted one in particular, "grit."

Grit is a modern rebranding of an old term; essentially it is a mixture of resilience, determination, and perseverance. The history of its synonyms traces the history of the education of "non-cognitive" traits.  Perseverance and resilience have been extensively studied by psychologists and were cornerstones of the various "character" education movements through the twentieth century.  In the nineteenth century and the colonial era, grit would have been known as "long-suffering."

Whatever the word, it is an important idea.  Here are three easy ways, ripped from the pages of From Rebel to Ruler, to improve your students' grittiness (and other important "non-cognitive" traits):

1. Stoic Reflection:  Like Emperor Marcus Aurelius, use a journal to confront difficulties.  Encourage them to think about negative emotions.  A good prompt:  "Anger reveals your values.  For example, if someone makes fun of your family and you get very angry, that means you value family highly.  When was the last time you were angry?  What values were revealed?"
2. Hero Worship:  Encourage students to find people in history that they admire and to learn everything they can about them.  A few interesting assignments could be, "Who was your hero's hero?" Or, "What was your hero like when he was your age?"  George Washington, as a youth, looked up to the Ancient Roman hero Cincinnatus, who was famous for stepping down after being granted absolute power.  After Washington won the Revolutionary War, he famously stepped out of public life for a few years, just like his hero.
3. Hobbies are Passions:  Encourage your students to think deeply about their hobbies, be they sports or creative pursuits.  A good assignment would be for them to teach their hobbies.  Where would a beginner start?  Why should anyone pursue this hobby?  Who are some of the best/most skilled/most admired at this hobby?  When did you realize you loved this hobby?

If you want more activities like these, to help you turn your rebellious teenagers into worthy leaders, click here.

"Heroes are made in the hour of defeat. Success is, therefore, well described as a series of glorious defeats." - Mohandas Gandhi

The "Big Five" personality traits, easily recalled by the acronym OCEAN, for Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism, are often discussed in psychology and pop psychology in the passive voice - for example, "in recent decades, there has been a growing consensus among psychologists that five factors blah blah…"

The Five Factors are interesting enough, and there are many free online resources to test yourself.  It is important to note that the Five Factors were chosen because they are very stable over a person's life.  Most conscientious adults were conscientious children.  Many studies also suggest that each of these five factors has a large genetic component. 

It is also important to emphasize that the Five Factors were not meant to provide a complete picture of a personality, nor are they the most important traits. (A brief brainstorm of other traits: courage, kindness, sense of humor)  The Big Five are stable and genetic and easy to measure.   

Honest researchers have begun doubting some of the statistical foundations of psychological research, in particular, the issue of "external validity," which is when a result is not relevant to another population.  Researchers at the University of British Columbia coined an acronym, WEIRD, which stands for Westernized, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic.  The vast majority of psychological research is conducted on American college (WEIRD) students, and therefore may be biased or irrelevant.

We may be missing vital aspects of human character, despite the studies being "scientific" or "randomly controlled," because life in modern western societies is so vasty different than the rest of the world (and the rest of history).

For example, psychologists have been trying to understand "everyday heroes," like the subway hero, who buck the "bystander effect," and have come up empty.  The subway hero, Wesley Autrey, is a construction worker who saved a man  who fell into the path of an oncoming train.  Autrey jumped onto the tracks, wrestled the man down and held him as the train passed over them, narrowly missing killing them both.

These guardian angels come from all walks of life.  Many are quiet and unassuming; some are not.
Many of these heroes change their lives after the event and continue a life of service.  The event seems to have awakened something in them.

Perhaps there is a hidden hero trait that is not easily detected in sheltered Western life.  There have been subway heroes after Wesley Autrey who left the scene and remain anonymous.  

Could you be a hero?

"He that increaseth wisdom, increaseth sorrow." 
- Robert Burton

There is a controversial term in psychology, depressive realism, which refers to the hypothesis that depressed people have a more realistic view of the world.  It has been backed up by a wide array of experiments.  

Other research has showed that putting people in "negative moods" actually boosts their memory.  The people in negative moods pay more attention and deliberate more carefully.  In the experiment, the people in negative moods were able to detect lies more readily and were less racist.

Aristotle believed that creativity was spurred on by melancholy; great poets, artists and philosophers, he said, all had a bit of the melancholic spirit, which he believed to be caused by an excess of black bile (melan choler).  His tutor and mentor Plato, and Plato's tutor and mentor, Socrates, were afflicted by melancholy.  Seneca, the great Stoic philosopher, quoted Aristotle on this and took it one step further, saying, "There is no genius without some touch of madness."

During the renaissance, a highly influential work, "The Anatomy of Melancholy," by Robert Burton, revived interest in melancholy.  A "Cult of Melancholy," in England, as well as a parallel movement, Sturm und Drang, in Germany, arose soon after.  Many of the works of Keats, Mozart, and Wagner are products of this period.

Certain psychologists believe that negative thinking and sadness are adaptive.  Sadness causes people to be introspective and solve problems: they are more attentive to their surroundings, less influenced by quick, positive emotions, and more focused on the facts.  Sadness, according to them, should not be avoided, but used.

Albrecht Durer, the famous German Renaissance artist, has a much debated piece, Melencholia I, which depicts a sad women in the grips of "melancholia imaginativa," or melancholy of the imagination, which is brought on when an artist is waiting for inspiration to strike.  

Sadness, according to the most remarkable people over the past two thousand years, appears to be the price we pay to solve problems, make insights and discoveries, and create art.