Walk down certain aisles of your local bookstore, and the covers of books will scream the words “leadership,” “creativity,” and “success” to the point that a skeptical person becomes nauseous. These are amazingly influential words that bend policy and shape people’s lives and desires. But what is the precise definition of each word? The simplest definition of a leader is someone who has followers. Is leadership, therefore, the art of attracting followers? That definition feels manipulative and amoral. And what is creativity? Wikipedia says that it is the process of developing something “new and valuable,” which sounds rather empty. Wikipedia defines success as the attainment of higher social status, which sounds awfully shallow. It often feels like the people writing the most about leadership are the ones leading the least. The term “thought leader” has been coined for these people. One can be equally cynical about the other terms. Making creativity the subject of bureaucratic policy seems hopelessly idiotic. Having young people chase success feels like we are throwing them into a hamster wheel and forcing them to ignore their inner lives. And success is entirely relative: Barack Obama, from the point of view of his high school classmates, must seem like an enormous success. But examined from the point of view of fellow presidents? So why chase something that becomes elusive the higher up you go? Reversing the terms can tame the cynicism. It is certainly clear what a lack of creativity entails: being stuck in a rut and repeating the same mistakes. The lack of leadership is similarly easy to define: being irresponsible and gullible. The lack of success is not so easy to define. Almost anyone will say that failure is part of a process of learning. So why not focus on the quality of the process rather than an ill-defined outcome? But it makes sense that creativity and leadership would be hard to define. If they could be formulated simply, they would already have been bureaucratized and computerized. However, they are distinctly thoughtful, human qualities that must be constantly reinvented and readapted. Perhaps, to borrow the famous phrase of Justice Stewart when defining obscenity, the best that you can say about creativity or leadership is, “I know it when I see it.”
5 Comments
Bevis The Thirty-Forth
3/30/2015 10:41:44 pm
I like your thought exercise of reversing the terms. Those book titles are meant to trigger the reptilian part of our brains.
Reply
Nicholas J Kurian
3/31/2015 04:46:43 am
Good point, but these words are driving serious academic studies...
Reply
elizabeth walsh
3/31/2015 11:12:17 am
In my last organization, we defined leaders this way: a leader is someone who gives "a team or organization the courage to truly
Reply
Nicholas J Kurian
4/1/2015 02:10:32 pm
Not a bad definition; interesting that leadership is always defined with superlatives ... What is sorta good leadership? "Gives an organization a bit of courage to think a little more about ordinary goals?"
Reply
Veronique
4/7/2015 02:47:51 pm
I believe creativity, simply, is an alternative way of doing things.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI'm an entrepreneur and I teach math, history, economics, and fitness. I'm looking for arguments. Archives
November 2019
|